7. And finally… Pull yourself…apart
The Heart Broken Into Pieces, torn apart, shattered, broken, divided, turned into pieces… What if we wanted to put it back together? Warhol claimed that he was never himself ('I never fall apart because I never fall together') – perhaps a fluid, or ad hoc assembled personality helps us avoid suffering, avoid being trapped in a single identity reflecting in others eyes what in consequences creates expectations and blocks changes. ‘The grammar of loss’ explores this existential topic.
‘Grammar’ as we know is a set of rules that helps us with communicating with others. Through communication, we form bonds or – in the context of the psychoanalytic automaton – we recreate bonds which, although with new people, often end in a similar way. If loss is inherent in this cycle, identity becomes trapped in a painful pattern, yearning for defragmentation, change and liberation. The artist compiles various symbols in a collage; the most significant of these, it seems to me, are the eyes and the sclera against a black background; it is as though the artist wishes to tell us that we can never see ourselves as a unified whole; rather, our identity is a dynamic collage of fragments of social roles, experiences, emotions and traditions.
Continuing this line of thought, which is critical of the Enlightenment’s notion of a coherent self, we might refer to another collage in this exhibition, created by Diego Rivera. We never fully know ourselves, our own motivations or those forgotten experiences from the future that perpetually govern us – this conclusion, which simplifies some of the ways in which psychoanalysis has influenced culture, seems to resonate in this artist’s work. In his collage, we are unable to tell whether the woman is placing a flower into or pulling it out of the man’s chest, which compels us to rethink subjectivity and decision-making in terms of collectivity and chance. Ignorance of one’s agenda and the vagaries of fate, which absolve us of responsibility (and of taking the blame for any failures).
This theme is also explored by Vitaly Krauss, who is the only artist participating in the exhibition to have chosen to use glitch as a tool to illustrate the inconsistency of subjectivity. In his video art, the filmed figure looks at the viewer, whilst his silhouette flickers, changing colour and contours; we alternately observe him and flashbacks and retrospectives that break identity free from fixed frameworks and restrictive patterns. A glitch is an error in the system, in a programmable transmission; a mistake that draws our attention to what is not working and requires attention that is necessary to heal oneself.
Darico Hasaya assisted by Furkan Aydın tackled a difficult subject, which she managed not to trivialise – what requires a certain amount of talent. To me, this exhibition seems like an obvious consequence of Darico Hasaya’s previous curatorial work. From the exhibition EV (‘home’ in Turkish), through artivism, (the exhibition: Los desastres de esta guerra in Peru, ‘I’m a woman’, UK) resilience in the face of trauma (of war, of identity, of relationships), to the eternal search for a home – in a world that, though it has always been our home, has lately been so reluctant to offer us shelter. Suffice it to say that today, in an age of housing crisis, most of us exist somewhere on a spectrum of homelessness, since only a few paychecks separate us from missing a rent or mortgage payment.
The curator is herself a descendant of war, and her practice often involves collaboration with migrant individuals, whose experiences resonate in presented works. In today’s world, where the language of marketing has absorbed the term ‘therapy’, Darico retrieves the meaning to that word, which originally (greek: θεραπεύω) meant tending, care and nurture – something we have been observing in Darico Hasaya’s curatorial work for several years now.